Japan Email Security: DMARC and MTA-STS Adoption Report 2025

In the first half of 2025 alone, Japan’s National Police Agency reported a staggering 1.2 million phishing cases, putting the nation on track to shatter all previous records. This digital siege has come with a devastating price tag: in 2024, financial losses from fraud and cyber scams reached an estimated 3.22 trillion JPY ($22 billion USD), with nearly one in three citizens targeted. This escalation has not gone unnoticed by authorities.

In response to this crisis, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) announced the implementation of a rigorous corporate cybersecurity rating system by fiscal year 2025. This move signals a critical shift: cybersecurity in Japan is no longer just an IT checkbox; it is a national economic priority.

This report provides a technical analysis of the email and domain security posture across Japan’s key sectors. It examines the paradox of high compliance but low enforcement, exposing the structural gaps that leave organizations vulnerable to the very breaches now making headlines.

Report Request - Japan DMARC Adoption

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*

Snapshot: Japan in Numbers

The following table aggregates data from 422 major Japanese domains, highlighting the disparity between protocol adoption and active protection.

SPF

DMARC

Japan DMARC

MTA-STS

DNSSEC

BIMI Logo

Security MetricPercentageInterpretation
SPF Correct95.0%Excellent foundational adoption.
DMARC Adoption74.6%High awareness, but often misconfigured.
DMARC Enforcement (Reject)9.2%Critical Gap: Only ~1 in 10 domains block imposters.
DMARC Monitoring Only (None)55.0%Majority of domains are visible but vulnerable.
MTA-STS Validity0.5%Near-total lack of transport layer encryption.
DNSSEC Enabled16.4%High vulnerability to DNS hijacking.

Start 15-day trial

Sector Radar: Who Is at Risk and Why

The aggregate numbers hide specific vulnerabilities within critical Japanese industries. Below is a detailed breakdown of the threat landscape by sector.

1. Banking: High-Value Targets, Partial Armor

The financial sector sits on the front line of fraud, yet only one in three banking domains actively blocks forged emails.

The Data

Metric Value
SPF Correct 93.9%
DMARC Record Exists 97.0%
DMARC p=reject (Protected) 33.3%
DMARC p=none (Vulnerable) 39.4%
MTA-STS Valid 1.5%
Banking SPF Adoption

The Risk Analysis

The Japanese banking sector is better protected than most, yet a significant vulnerability gap remains. Nearly two out of three (66.7%) banking domains are not at p=reject. This allows sophisticated attackers to bypass filters and land spoofed “Urgent Wire Transfer” or “Security Alert” emails directly in the inboxes of high-net-worth clients and internal staff.

Furthermore, with only 1.5% utilizing MTA-STS, the vast majority of financial correspondence, including transaction confirmations and sensitive client data, is transmitted without enforced encryption, leaving it susceptible to Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks and downgrade exploits.

The PowerDMARC Solution

  • Staged Enforcement:
    Guided transition from     p=none to p=reject using AI-driven threat modeling to ensure legitimate transaction emails are never blocked.
  • Hosted MTA-STS:
    Rapid deployment of transport encryption to meet global financial compliance standards without burdening internal IT teams.

2. Education: A Credential Harvesting Hotspot

Universities are prime targets for research espionage and identity theft, yet enforcement is barely present.

The Data

Metric Value
SPF Correct 96.0%
No DMARC Record 32.0%
DMARC p=none 57.3%
DMARC p=reject 6.7%
MTA-STS Valid 0.0%

The Risk Analysis

The education sector is dangerously exposed. One in three domains lacks a DMARC record entirely, and over half are stuck in monitoring mode. This creates an open season for phishing campaigns disguised as “IT Password Resets,” “Grant Applications,” or “Exam Results.”

The impact is severe: a single compromised student or faculty account can lead to large-scale data exfiltration of proprietary research or the hijacking of university computing resources for crypto-mining. The 0.0% adoption of MTA-STS means that intellectual property shared via email is often traversing the web in clear text.

The PowerDMARC Solution

  • Multi-Tenant Management:
    Centralized visibility across disparate faculties, departments, and alumni mail systems.
  • Policy-as-a-Service:
    A simplified model allowing institutions to achieve enterprise-grade security without the need for a dedicated Security Operations Center (SOC).

3. Government: Digital Services with Soft Edges

Agencies are digitizing citizen services faster than they are securing the communication channels that deliver them.

The Data

Metric Value
SPF Correct 95.8%
No DMARC Record 26.3%
DMARC p=none 61.1%
DMARC p=reject 4.2%
MTA-STS Valid 0.0%

The Risk Analysis

As Japan pushes for “Society 5.0” and increased digitization of government services, the email security infrastructure lags behind. With over 60% of domains at p=none and 26% having no DMARC at all, citizens are highly vulnerable to spoofed emails regarding tax payments, pension notifications, or disaster relief.

The complete absence (0.0%) of MTA-STS exposes official government communications to interception. This erodes public trust in e-government portals, as citizens cannot verify if an email truly originated from a government agency or if its contents were altered in transit.

The PowerDMARC Solution

  • National Deployment Playbooks:
    Strategies tailored for moving large, complex domain portfolios to enforcement in compliance with national cybersecurity baselines.
  • DNSSEC & MTA-STS:
    Streamlined implementation frameworks designed to fit within public-sector procurement and change-control processes.
Book a demo

4. Healthcare: Life-and-Death Communications

In healthcare, a spoofed email can impact not only finances but patient safety and privacy.

The Data

Metric Value
SPF Correct 95.2%
No DMARC Record 42.8%
DMARC p=none 52.4%
DMARC p=reject 0.0%
DNSSEC Enabled 4.8%
Healthcare DNSSEC Adoption

The Risk Analysis

This is perhaps the most alarming dataset. Zero percent of healthcare domains enforce p=reject. This means every single healthcare domain analyzed is technically susceptible to direct domain spoofing.

Attackers can impersonate hospital administrators or insurance providers to send fake “Test Result Notifications” or “Payment Reminders,” tricking patients into disclosing sensitive medical and financial data. The lack of encryption enforcement (MTA-STS) further jeopardizes compliance with patient privacy regulations.

The PowerDMARC Solution

  • Risk-Aware Ramp-up:
    A careful transition to enforcement that prioritizes the delivery of critical clinical emails (lab reports, appointment reminders) while blocking threats.
  • Seamless Encryption:
    Hosted MTA-STS to encrypt email flows without requiring complex reconfigurations of legacy hospital mail servers.

5. Media: Disinformation and Source Exposure

Japanese media houses defend democracy and public perception, yet attackers can still spoof their mastheads with ease.

The Data

Metric Value
SPF Correct 89.7%
No DMARC Record 24.1%
DMARC p=none (Vulnerable) 69.0%
DMARC p=reject (Protected) 5.2%
MTA-STS Valid 0.0%
Media SPF Adoption

The Risk Analysis

The media sector has the lowest SPF correctness (89.7%) of all analyzed industries, indicating struggles with managing complex sender infrastructures (newsletters, marketing, third-party tools).

More critically, nearly 70% of domains sit at p=none. This allows malicious actors to impersonate trusted news outlets to spread “Fake News,” circulate disinformation during elections, or send fake subscription renewal notices to harvest credit card details.

With 0.0% MTA-STS adoption, communications between journalists and confidential sources are unencrypted, posing a severe risk to source protection and press freedom.

The PowerDMARC Solution

  • Journalist Protection:
    Rapid escalation to     p=quarantine and p=reject to ensure no one can masquerade as a reporter or editor.
  • Shadow IT Visibility:
    Identification of unauthorized third-party mailing services often used by marketing or regional desks.

6. Telecommunications: Gatekeepers with Open Doors

Telcos secure national connectivity but leave the front door open in their own email infrastructure.

The Data

Metric Value
SPF Correct 95.5%
No DMARC Record 17.9%
DMARC p=none (Vulnerable) 49.3%
DMARC p=reject (Protected) 9.0%
DNSSEC Enabled 9.0%
BIMI Logo

The Risk Analysis

Telecommunications providers are high-value targets for “SIM-swap” attacks and account takeovers. With nearly half (49.3%) of domains at p=none and almost 20% having no DMARC at all, attackers can easily spoof “Billing Updates,” “Data Limit Warnings,” or “SIM Upgrade” emails to trick customers into handing over credentials.

The low DNSSEC adoption (9.0%) is ironic for the connectivity providers, leaving their own infrastructure vulnerable to DNS spoofing that can redirect customer traffic.

The PowerDMARC Solution

  • High-Volume Policy Management:
    Specialized enforcement strategies that handle millions of customer notifications without triggering false positives.
  • DNS-Centric Controls:
    Strengthening the DNS layer to protect both customer-facing portals and internal operational domains.
Start 15-day trial

7. Transport: Tickets, Cargo, and Trust on the Move

From airlines to logistics, transport organizations run on email, and too many still trust unauthenticated messages.

The Data

Metric Value
SPF Correct 98.4%
No DMARC Record 39.7%
DMARC p=none (Vulnerable) 55.6%
DMARC p=reject (Protected) 0.0%
MTA-STS Valid 0.0%

The Risk Analysis

The Transport sector has the highest SPF correctness (98.4%) but the weakest enforcement. Zero percent of transport domains enforce p=reject.

This gap invites attackers to send fake “Flight Cancellation,” “Customs Invoice,” or “Delivery Reschedule” emails. In logistics, this can lead to cargo theft or supply chain redirection. For consumer travel, it opens the door to massive credential harvesting and credit card fraud.

Like the other sectors, the 0.0% MTA-STS score means that sensitive cargo manifests, passenger itineraries, and passport data are often transmitted without verified encryption.

The PowerDMARC Solution

  • Supply Chain Integrity:
    Rapid rollout of     DMARC policies tuned for booking engines, global distribution systems (GDS), and logistics partner integrations.
  • B2B & B2C Protection:
    Simultaneous protection for high-volume consumer notifications (tickets/boarding passes) and sensitive B2B cargo communications.

Under the Hood: Four Structural Weaknesses

Beyond the sector-specific risks, four systemic weaknesses plague the Japanese email ecosystem.

1. The “Comfort Trap” of p=none

55.0% of Japanese domains have DMARC but lack enforcement. This “monitoring only” mode offers visibility but zero protection. It is a false sense of security that allows attackers to continue spoofing trusted brands while the organization merely watches it happen in the logs.

“A policy of p=none is like installing a security camera but leaving the front door unlocked. You can watch the burglars enter, but you are powerless to stop them. Japan’s high adoption rate is promising, but without shifting to p=reject, the job is only half done.”

Maitham Al Lawati, CEO, PowerDMARC

“We see this constantly in large enterprises: they add a new marketing tool and suddenly their invoicing emails start bouncing. The 10-lookup limit is a hard ceiling in DNS. Without ‘SPF Flattening’ technology to compress these records, growing your digital stack inevitably breaks your email deliverability.”

Yunes Tarada, Service Delivery Manager, PowerDMARC

2. SPF Complexity at Scale

While 95.0% of domains have correct SPF, the remaining 5.0% face critical misconfigurations. In complex organizations, this often stems from hitting the “10-lookup limit” for DNS queries, causing legitimate emails from third-party vendors (CRM, HR systems) to fail authentication and disappear.

3. MTA-STS: The Blind Spot

With only 0.5% validity across the board, Japan has a near-total blind spot regarding transport security. Without MTA-STS, attackers can perform “Downgrade Attacks,” forcing email servers to drop encryption and transmit messages in plain text, readable by anyone monitoring the network.

“Standard email encryption (STARTTLS) is opportunistic; it asks for encryption but doesn’t demand it. MTA-STS is the only way to force that lock. With 99.5% of Japanese domains lacking this, it’s trivial for an attacker to strip away encryption and read sensitive corporate communications in transit.”

Ayan Bhuiya, Operations & Delivery Shift Lead, PowerDMARC

“Organizations invest heavily in building brand trust, but a single DNS hijacking incident can shatter that in seconds. DNSSEC acts as the guardian of your digital identity, ensuring that when customers reach out, they connect with the real you. It’s no longer just an IT protocol; it’s a fundamental layer of brand reputation management.”

Ahona Rudra, Marketing Manager, PowerDMARC

4. DNSSEC: The Weak Foundation

DNSSEC is enabled on just 16.4% of domains. Without this, the directory system of the internet (DNS) is unprotected. Sophisticated attackers can hijack the DNS response, redirecting a company’s entire email flow to a rogue server without the sender or receiver ever knowing.

Contact us

Global Benchmarking: Japan in Context

To truly understand the “Japan Paradox,” we must place its 2025 data alongside PowerDMARC’s recent findings from Europe, Africa, South America, and Oceania.

The data reveals a startling reality: Japan has the world’s highest foundational compliance (SPF) but ranks dangerously low on actual enforcement (p=reject).

While nations like Sweden and Norway have successfully translated adoption into protection (blocking attacks), Japan remains stuck in “monitoring mode.” Perhaps most alarmingly, Peru, Nigeria, and Italy all enforce strict security policies at significantly higher rates than Japan.

The Global Leaderboard: 2025 Data

Data from PowerDMARC 2025 Regional Adoption Reports.

CountrySPF Correct (Identity)DMARC Adoption (Visibility)DMARC Enforcement (p=reject)MTA-STS (Encryption)
Sweden 🇸🇪85.0%77.9%29.9%2.9%
Norway 🇳🇴85.2%83.1%29.0%2.8%
Belgium 🇧🇪90.1%79.1%24.7%<1.0%
Peru 🇵🇪86.1%66.0%17.9%0.6%
Italy 🇮🇹91.0%74.0%16.7%~1.0%
New Zealand 🇳🇿81.2%62.5%16.7%1.3%
Nigeria 🇳🇬70.3%45.9%14.2%0.0%
Japan 🇯🇵95.0%74.6%9.2%0.5%
Morocco 🇲🇦71.3%36.5%7.5%0.0%
Tunisia 🇹🇳76.4%30.1%4.8%0.0%

Critical Insights: Where Japan Stands

1. The Nordic Standard (Sweden & Norway)

  • The Benchmark: The Scandinavian nations set the global standard for “active defense.” With enforcement rates hovering near 30%, roughly 1 in 3 domains actively blocks spoofing attempts.
  • The Japan Gap: Japan has significantly higher SPF adoption (95% vs ~85%) but 3x lower enforcement. This confirms that Japanese IT teams are excellent at compliance (ticking the box) but hesitant to activate the protection.

2. The “Surprising” Challengers (Peru & Nigeria)

  • The Reality Check: It is a sobering statistic that Peru (17.9%) and Nigeria (14.2%) have substantially higher enforcement rates than Japan (9.2%).
  • The Context: Nigeria, often battling a reputation for email fraud, has taken aggressive steps to lock down its corporate domains. Japan’s conservative approach, prioritizing caution over blocking, has left it more exposed than these emerging digital economies.

3. The Shared Struggle (Tunisia & Morocco)

  • The Comparison: Japan’s enforcement rate (9.2%) is dangerously close to early-stage markets like Morocco (7.5%) and Tunisia (4.8%).
  • The Insight: Despite having a “First World” infrastructure (high SPF), Japan effectively has a “Developing World” security posture when it comes to stopping attacks. The gap between having the tools and using them is widest in Japan compared to any other nation analyzed.

The PowerDMARC Verdict

“Japan is a global anomaly. In most countries, the struggle is getting companies to publish a DMARC record at all. In Japan, the records are there; awareness is high, but the switch is left ‘off’.

When we look at Sweden or Belgium, we see the future: high adoption paired with high enforcement. Japan is currently a ‘Paper Tiger’: it looks formidable on a compliance checklist (95% SPF), but in practice, it offers little resistance to an attacker.”

PowerDMARC Threat Intelligence Team

Conclusion: From Metrics to Action

The data is clear: Japan has laid the foundation (SPF) but has not yet built the walls (DMARC Enforcement) or the roof (MTA-STS).

Organizations in Japan do not need another wake-up call in the form of a headline-grabbing breach. They need a controlled, guided path to enforcement. PowerDMARC transforms this vulnerability into resilience by:

Simplifying encryption with Hosted MTA-STS and DNSSEC.

Automating the journey from p=none to p=reject.

Aligning with regulations through sector-specific compliance playbooks.

Book a demo Contact us

PowerDMARC Perspective

“Japan has the technical groundwork to be a global leader in email authentication. The urgent imperative now is to evolve from passive visibility to active defense, converting exceptional SPF adoption into strict DMARC enforcement. Sectors currently lagging in protection, such as Transport and Healthcare, have the opportunity to rapidly elevate their posture, turning their email domains from vulnerable targets into trusted communication channels.”

Turn Visibility into Defense Today

Japan’s high adoption rates prove that organizations are ready for security—they just need the right partner to flip the switch. Don’t let your domain remain a “Paper Tiger.” Move from passive monitoring to active protection before the next wave of attacks hits.

Contact PowerDMARC to start your journey to enforcement.

Start 15-day trial Book a demo